Suzanne Gilad

Notes from the Wings/Philanthropy

People Over Plaques: Why My Philanthropy Targets Human Potential

Forgetting the marble lobbies and focus on the human beings backstage who keep the industry alive.

By Sue GiladJune 30, 20265 min read
A young arts student rehearsing at a piano in a sunlit studio — the human potential scholarships fund.
Share

I remember standing in the lobby of a historic house—one of the blue-chip Broadway theaters we all know—during a particularly grueling load-in for 'Angels in America' back in 2018. The air was thick with the scent of sawdust and fresh paint. Everywhere I looked, there were brass plates and etched glass, names of donors who had funded the renovation of a lounge or the gilding of a balcony. These are beautiful gestures, and the physical preservation of our theaters is vital work. But as I watched a young apprentice technician struggle to find a quiet corner to eat a sandwich because they were working three jobs just to stay in the city, the disconnect felt physical.

The theater is nothing without its architecture, but it is hollow without its people. When I look at the landscape of theater philanthropy, I see a constant pull toward the permanent: the brick, the mortar, the limestone. There is a specific kind of immortality promised by a capital campaign. Yet, my focus shifted years ago toward the ephemeral and the essential: the student who can’t afford the tuition for a summer intensive, the emerging playwright who needs a month of rent covered to finish a second act, or the aspiring producer who lacks the seed capital to join a general partnership.

A name on a wall will outlast a person, but a person with an opportunity will change an entire industry.

Sue Gilad

The Return on Human Capital

When we talk about capitalization in a Broadway context, we usually mean the millions required to get a show to opening night. But in theater philanthropy, I think of capitalization differently. It is the practice of providing the 'startup costs' for a human life in the arts. While a plush seat in a theater might last twenty years before it needs reupholstering, a scholarship recipient carries the impact of that support for forty. They become the designers, the stage managers, and the lead producers who sustain the ecosystem.

I have seen what happens when we remove the financial barrier for a student from an underrepresented community. It isn't just about paying a bill. It's about the psychological shift that happens when a young person realizes someone is betting on their talent, not their ability to navigate a bank loan. One of our scholarship recipients recently told me that the funding allowed them to stop working night shifts at a diner and finally take an unpaid internship at a major casting office. That internship led to a full-time job. That job led to a seat at the table where casting decisions for a major musical were made. That is how you change the room.

Investing in the Room, Not the Walls

If you are evaluating where to direct your giving in the arts, I encourage you to look past the capital campaigns. Buildings are static. People are dynamic. When we fund a scholarship, we are buying a future seat for someone who might otherwise be priced out of the conversation. This philosophy has guided my work with various institutions, ensuring that the legacy I leave isn't etched in stone, but reflected in the credits of a Playbill.

Theater thrives on risk. In the 'producer' seat, I take risks on scripts and creative teams. In the 'philanthropist' seat, I take risks on potential. It is perhaps the most rewarding investment I have ever made—one where the recoupment isn't measured in dollars, but in the widening of the door for the next generation.

How to pivot your arts giving toward people

  1. 01

    Identify the opportunity gaps

    Look for programs that support the 'unsexy' costs: transportation, housing for interns, or application fees for MFA programs.

  2. 02

    Prioritize unrestricted funds

    Give to scholarship funds that allow the institution to direct the money to the student with the highest immediate need, rather than strictly merit-based awards.

  3. 03

    Ask about mentorship

    The best philanthropic programs pair money with mentorship. Ensure your contribution supports a framework where recipients are also getting guidance.

  4. 04

    Value the behind-the-scenes

    Consider funding scholarships for technical theater, arts administration, or stage management—roles that are often overlooked in favor of performers.

Frequently asked

Questions about this piece

Related reading

More notes from the wings

Philanthropy

Stop Funding Bricks: Human-Centered Arts Giving

I prefer to put my name on a student's future rather than a theater's lobby. Discover why moving away from naming rights allows for a more vibrant, equitable Broadway ecosystem.

July 11, 2026·8 min read

Philanthropy

Strategy for Creating a Theater Scholarship Program

Learn how to structure a theater scholarship that prioritizes human potential over infrastructure, focusing on high-impact disciplines like stage management and technical design.

July 10, 2026·7 min read

A young theatre student standing alone on a rehearsal stage under a warm gold spotlight.

Philanthropy

What Makes a Scholarship Worth Applying For

Why I started two scholarships with very different rules, and what I wish more students knew before they apply.

June 1, 2026·5 min read

← Back to all notes